这是对那些做一点，以为自己做最多，到处在当事人背后说是非的王八。
UPS 是我建议，我去处理。有任何疑问可以直接问我，有何须在背后放暗箭？
是我没提供完整的过程给波波，不关她事怎么又要牵扯她在内？
是不是你们上了709就最伟大，就可以背后无情批判，但却选择不直接对我说？
不要忘记，说的没出钱，也没贡献。还有，从头到尾我都说我先自己买来确定，阿公钱从来没到我手。
东西买了，我们改装了，在店主面前将Buzzer去掉，可以无声，也省电。过后因为电源开关有问题，又抬过去Tony家去修。然后我们就在昨天下午一起测试。
为了不浪费时间，在测试同时也断断续续充电，希望昨晚可以交付。
我们用3台电话充电器，一台手提电脑，测试方式如下：
手机充电器，规格：5V 500mA输出。
手提电脑充电器，规格：16.5V，3.65A
第一次，耗时3分钟，接上一台手机充电器，手机充电器和UPS插头的neutral线搭上电流表，开电源，开UPS，电流耗大约100mA。
第二个三分钟：关完全部，开UPS，接手机充电器，电流耗大约95mA。
第三个三分钟：关完全部，开UPS，接手机充电器，接上电话，耗约430mA
第4个3分钟，接上2台手机充电器，手机充电器和UPS插头的neutral线搭上电流表，开电源，开UPS，电流耗为100mA和110mA
第5个三分钟：关完全部，开UPS，接2台手机充电器，电流耗各约95mA和98mA
第6个三分钟：关完全部，开UPS，接2台手机充电器，接上2台电话，各耗约430mA，和480mA
两台充电器和Nokia手机都是同一型号，得出如此结果应该是第2台充电器能耗较高。因为没有太离谱，就当是元件和生产时间有误差。
第7个3分钟，接上3台手机充电器，手机充电器和UPS插头的neutral线搭上电流表，开电源，开UPS，电流耗为100mA，110mA，99mA
第8个三分钟：关完全部，开UPS，接3台手机充电器，电流耗各约95mA，98mA，96mA
第9个三分钟：关完全部，开UPS，接3台手机充电器，接上3台电话，各耗约430mA，480mA，465mA
第3台nokia基本上得出的数据也差不远，应该无误。
应该另外补充：接第三台充电器时，我们试了2种Extension，一种有灯，一种普通的。
有灯的每颗发亮时耗30~80mA不等，所以决定不用。
整个测试的最大问题是没人知道这台UPS有环保Green功能，今晚在独立广场充相机电池才遇到5分钟自动关机。盒子没写，只有说明书有一句提到有环保功能，不过没说明什么时候断电。
因为我们以3分钟为一段测试。一般的情形下，一分钟的读数已经足够，但Tony和我都认为3分钟能给我们比较合理的平均值，太长时间不行是因为我必须当天下午到PJ处理公事，不能待太久。
不过整个测试也耗了大约1小时45分，因为间中有讨论，检查结果再核对。
然后到PJ时我不能充电，也不肯定ups电源是否充满，因为第一次充电需要6小时。
在和occupydataran电话联系后，他们认为因为前晚的意外，最好昨天看看情况再说。我也说了需要确保电源充足。
昨晚回来后，充电到今天出门，共14小时，应该满电。
下午到独立广场，要交给他们时，他们建议晚上才领。
当时发了讯给律师公会，问说他们是否能够允许给予方便充电，没回应。
在独立广场看到附近有教堂，和occupydataran取得共识后，我就去教堂问充电的事，那时离occupydataran的记者会还有10分钟，他们不便和我一起，就自己去教堂问。
遇到教堂书局负责人，询问后她说必须和教堂理事谈。理事当时有事处理，我就和书局负责人谈天等。负责人当然和我谈关于基督的事，我们等着，谈了大约20分钟。
理事忙完了，下来接见我时，开始的态度是教会没有先例。
我当然也表明为何希望教会帮忙给予方便充电，谈了15分钟，理事说他必须向神父请示，神父不巧出门了。我要到office，就请理事电话通知，他答应最迟星期六给予神父的决定。
回到独立广场交代了与教会会谈的结果，赶到KLCC附近的office，已经4点半。六点就急着回去dataran要把东西交割。
到了dataran，他们说现在还不需要，迟点会找我。
我就等到大约9点半，终于交付后，他们要充相机电池，就打开使用。当时波波来电说不舒服，我叫他先回，就想着离开去喂猫。
不经意看到相机充电灯灭了，以为有人关机，就开机再来。然后坐着观察。发觉UPS5分钟后自动关机时，第一时间联络Tony，问可能的状况。
决定把UPS带到tony家去时，遇到阿包，发了些牢骚，就赶着去。
波波来电，就请他喂猫，我去解决Ups问题。
这段时候，认为应该对大家有个交代，就贴FB告知状况。
到Tony在pandan indah家，进了他的工作时室，拆机，两个人看着电板，没有线路图，只得靠两人对电子元件的理解，分析电板。
大约10分钟，给我们找到一个两个人都认为是节能的线路，有了共识，tony下手，两下，就解决。
然后我们接上2个40w的灯泡，连续测试7分钟，再来一个7分钟确定，把UPS装回，再赶回去dataran。
间中我们已经商量了如果解决不了问题，plan B 是什么。
回到dataran，正在开会，等了一会，不能再等，就交给其中一个，测试了8分钟无误，匆匆忙忙回家，家里的狗不要波波带他们走街，加上下雨，我必须要尽快回家。
当中见到美凤和可人，谈了有关如何替ups充电的安排，细节不表。
那些背后放箭的，请继续犯贱，若对号入座，请便。
话再说一遍，你们乱说话也得认清到底应该针对谁，有得冤就冤那和反贪会有何不同，那你们有啥资格评论反贪会？
还有，革命没成功，你们这些就只会学舌，专对付＂同志＂，难怪国阵这么烂都不倒，不就是有你们这些做少少、呱呱叫说自己多伟大多伟大的弄翻自己的船？
要骂架，你们不够班；做金手指？你们不配；
有本事就告诉我428警方会动员若干，用什么策略？告诉我明天najib会不会和学生会面交流？
玩这些？提鞋你们都不配！
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Friday, April 20, 2012
The Occupy Dataran revisited
Frankly, I do not know much about the Occupy Dataran, yet I think the movement is a phenomena of soul searching and reviewing our current state of democracy.
The Occupy Dataran first appeared and occupied the Dataran Merdeka since last July, a few weeks ahead of the much publicized Occupy Wall Street.
The movement is loosely formed by individuals who have concern over certain issues, or simply enjoying weekly gatherings in the Dataran Merdeka.
It is interesting to observe their processes, their thoughts, the way they discuss, which can be small to some but important for the person who brought it up, or as serious as discussing national or international issues.
There's no leader in the movement, everyone is equal and are free to bring any issue forward for discussion.
Occupy Dataran works on consensus of all, if any one of the participating member in their assembly block a motion, then motion will not turn to action.
Another interesting point is that the movement does not have so called membership, or one must attained a certain qualification to join their assembly. You can walk in and join, listen, participate in debate or discussion, or you can be a bystander, it is entirely up to you as an individual. The movement does not impose any restrictions to anyone.
I have recently read tweets concerning the movement, some simply ignore, some said it is too idealistic and can never implement in a large scale.
Those commented, I do hope they spend some time observing on site, talk to them, see and hear with your own eyes and ears.
I am not sure if this a model of future society, but it brings me back to the ancient Greece, pretty much the same feeling.
If you are looking for something new, try the Occupy Dataran movement, there's no barrier, just like the Dataran Merdeka.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
The Occupy Dataran first appeared and occupied the Dataran Merdeka since last July, a few weeks ahead of the much publicized Occupy Wall Street.
The movement is loosely formed by individuals who have concern over certain issues, or simply enjoying weekly gatherings in the Dataran Merdeka.
It is interesting to observe their processes, their thoughts, the way they discuss, which can be small to some but important for the person who brought it up, or as serious as discussing national or international issues.
There's no leader in the movement, everyone is equal and are free to bring any issue forward for discussion.
Occupy Dataran works on consensus of all, if any one of the participating member in their assembly block a motion, then motion will not turn to action.
Another interesting point is that the movement does not have so called membership, or one must attained a certain qualification to join their assembly. You can walk in and join, listen, participate in debate or discussion, or you can be a bystander, it is entirely up to you as an individual. The movement does not impose any restrictions to anyone.
I have recently read tweets concerning the movement, some simply ignore, some said it is too idealistic and can never implement in a large scale.
Those commented, I do hope they spend some time observing on site, talk to them, see and hear with your own eyes and ears.
I am not sure if this a model of future society, but it brings me back to the ancient Greece, pretty much the same feeling.
If you are looking for something new, try the Occupy Dataran movement, there's no barrier, just like the Dataran Merdeka.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
占据独立广场和废除高教贷款二三四
什么是占据独立广场？
占据运动是草根运动，也是群众运动。
为何要占据？
占据，是一种象征，象征草根要向权贵夺回自主权。
想知道更多有关占据独立广场运动的资料，游览 占据独立广场
------
废除高教贷款运动，是由学生所发起，争取免费大专教育的运动。
一般人想法，或主流媒体制造的现象，都认为学生志在为自己打算，希望籍此运动，一笔勾销他们的贷款，这对发起运动的学生来说，是有欠公平的。
不否认有些在籍学生，甚至一些前学生，希望能一举取消他们的贷款偿还，但这些不过是一些心存侥幸的想法，说的白一点，是自私的想法。
废除高教贷款运动，是基于国家财务管理不当，大事挥霍，学生的论点是：倘若国家可以挥霍，为何不将之用于教育。
高教学费没有因为私立大专林立，而变得合理。相反的，高教学费年年增长，无论是在国立或私立大专求学，学生在没有其他的选择下，比如得不到奖学金等，只能向高教基金贷款。
举个例子，槟城的国立理科大学财政预算竟然比槟城州政府的财政预算来得高，因为开销庞大，所以学费也得高涨。不论如何，一间国立大学开销比所在地的州政府开销来得高这么样都说不过去。
当政府允许国立大专涨学费时，私立大专更不用说，当然比国立更高。
另一个令人诟病的，是政府的政策令得学生毕业后无用武之地，因为学习的，和市场需要的，是两回事。
学生毕业后发觉原来自己本科没有市场，就算有，起薪也不高。而高教贷款偿还就像超重的包袱。
在这样的情形下，就出现了学生不偿还贷款的状况，而拖欠的数额远远超过收回的贷款，当局在这方面是乎没有考量，也没有应对方案。
话说回头，这一切，说明了当局基本上没把办教育当成是一项严肃、重要的项目，而且在管理方面差强人意，之后承担的除了贷款的学生，还有高教基金的资金来源，最大的资金来源，就是公积金。
当大部分的贷款收不回来时，公积金承担最大的风险。政府可以说收不回的贷款由政府承担，就是说明纳税的，不管是直接或间接的纳税人必须为追不回的贷款买单。所以左右，最后都是你我承担。
那么，高教贷款的最大受益人是谁？就是国立大专的供应商，和私立大专的投资者。
既然如此，高教贷款对我们，对学生来说，都是噩梦，既然是噩梦，为何还要抱住不放？
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
占据运动是草根运动，也是群众运动。
为何要占据？
占据，是一种象征，象征草根要向权贵夺回自主权。
想知道更多有关占据独立广场运动的资料，游览 占据独立广场
------
废除高教贷款运动，是由学生所发起，争取免费大专教育的运动。
一般人想法，或主流媒体制造的现象，都认为学生志在为自己打算，希望籍此运动，一笔勾销他们的贷款，这对发起运动的学生来说，是有欠公平的。
不否认有些在籍学生，甚至一些前学生，希望能一举取消他们的贷款偿还，但这些不过是一些心存侥幸的想法，说的白一点，是自私的想法。
废除高教贷款运动，是基于国家财务管理不当，大事挥霍，学生的论点是：倘若国家可以挥霍，为何不将之用于教育。
高教学费没有因为私立大专林立，而变得合理。相反的，高教学费年年增长，无论是在国立或私立大专求学，学生在没有其他的选择下，比如得不到奖学金等，只能向高教基金贷款。
举个例子，槟城的国立理科大学财政预算竟然比槟城州政府的财政预算来得高，因为开销庞大，所以学费也得高涨。不论如何，一间国立大学开销比所在地的州政府开销来得高这么样都说不过去。
当政府允许国立大专涨学费时，私立大专更不用说，当然比国立更高。
另一个令人诟病的，是政府的政策令得学生毕业后无用武之地，因为学习的，和市场需要的，是两回事。
学生毕业后发觉原来自己本科没有市场，就算有，起薪也不高。而高教贷款偿还就像超重的包袱。
在这样的情形下，就出现了学生不偿还贷款的状况，而拖欠的数额远远超过收回的贷款，当局在这方面是乎没有考量，也没有应对方案。
话说回头，这一切，说明了当局基本上没把办教育当成是一项严肃、重要的项目，而且在管理方面差强人意，之后承担的除了贷款的学生，还有高教基金的资金来源，最大的资金来源，就是公积金。
当大部分的贷款收不回来时，公积金承担最大的风险。政府可以说收不回的贷款由政府承担，就是说明纳税的，不管是直接或间接的纳税人必须为追不回的贷款买单。所以左右，最后都是你我承担。
那么，高教贷款的最大受益人是谁？就是国立大专的供应商，和私立大专的投资者。
既然如此，高教贷款对我们，对学生来说，都是噩梦，既然是噩梦，为何还要抱住不放？
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Location:独立广场
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Why I valued OccupyDataran movement
Last night, I told my wife, we need to show support to those who have been occupying Dataran Merdeka since last July 2011.
The occupiers have since without failed, even with interventions from the Authority, stayed in the Dataran Merdeka every weekends.
I salute their determination, their focus on issues, ie the people must gain their control back on matters affecting their everyday life and not by the bereaucrats and influencial businesses.
However, the society in general ignoring the existence of Occupy Dataran, some even laughed at them claiming that only the mad and retarded will act in such.
I see it otherwise. These people are just normal people, they too have to work hard to earn their living, but they choose to express their dissatisfaction by consistently repeating the same every week, without fail.
It is their determination and courage that we should appreciate, whether you agree with their cause, it is not easy to have it weekly, and they are not rich guys looking for excitement, they mean what they said, and they did it, and still doing.
They need no fund for their cause, but if you wish to donate, by all means. they are working on shoestring budget individually that they have to squeeze from their earnings.
But they do need food, drink, and now tent contributions.
If you can, pay them a visit. If you are not prepare to bring anything, it's ok, go there, speak to them, you'll be surprise they are not blind follower, they know what they want, and what they are doing.
Or perhaps, you may just want to join them atleast for a night.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
The occupiers have since without failed, even with interventions from the Authority, stayed in the Dataran Merdeka every weekends.
I salute their determination, their focus on issues, ie the people must gain their control back on matters affecting their everyday life and not by the bereaucrats and influencial businesses.
However, the society in general ignoring the existence of Occupy Dataran, some even laughed at them claiming that only the mad and retarded will act in such.
I see it otherwise. These people are just normal people, they too have to work hard to earn their living, but they choose to express their dissatisfaction by consistently repeating the same every week, without fail.
It is their determination and courage that we should appreciate, whether you agree with their cause, it is not easy to have it weekly, and they are not rich guys looking for excitement, they mean what they said, and they did it, and still doing.
They need no fund for their cause, but if you wish to donate, by all means. they are working on shoestring budget individually that they have to squeeze from their earnings.
But they do need food, drink, and now tent contributions.
If you can, pay them a visit. If you are not prepare to bring anything, it's ok, go there, speak to them, you'll be surprise they are not blind follower, they know what they want, and what they are doing.
Or perhaps, you may just want to join them atleast for a night.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
Friday, April 13, 2012
Thursday, April 12, 2012
How many Lynas can you stop?
When Himpunan Hijau announced their plan to march from KLCC, and carry coffin to the Australian High Commissions, before joining Bersih 3.0 at the Dataran Merdeka, I was kind of stunt with Himpunan Hijau's decision.
Granted Himpunan Hijau can do what they wanted, with the sole purpose of getting rid of Lynas, but why must there be a side dish when the purpose of having Bersih 3.0 is to have the best ever main course?
Can we ask ourselves a simple question:
How many Lynas can we kill? When a simple solution to the problem is to get rid of those wanted to stay in power yet ignoring your calls?
You can kill Lynas today, with massive show-off of your strength, but can you kill all Lynas alike mushrooming everywhere in the country, one after another?
Then why not give a killer punch and get rid of those obstacles, instead?
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Granted Himpunan Hijau can do what they wanted, with the sole purpose of getting rid of Lynas, but why must there be a side dish when the purpose of having Bersih 3.0 is to have the best ever main course?
Can we ask ourselves a simple question:
How many Lynas can we kill? When a simple solution to the problem is to get rid of those wanted to stay in power yet ignoring your calls?
You can kill Lynas today, with massive show-off of your strength, but can you kill all Lynas alike mushrooming everywhere in the country, one after another?
Then why not give a killer punch and get rid of those obstacles, instead?
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Sunday, April 8, 2012
There must be something more than just the truth of Teoh Beng Hock's death
I do not agree when some said it is customary for the Authority to cover up or protect the law enforcers, on cases which clearly the law enforcers are at fault, such as Teoh Beng Hock and Sabani's death.
Both of them died under the care of the MACC, both of their cases were somehow twisted even to the extent of defying existing Laws, to ensure that Pandora's box is sealed tightly.
I do not think that those in power are not keen to have these cases cleared with truth revealed. this will help the ruling regime in the upcoming General Election.
Then, what is the motive of covering up the truth, protecting suspected officers ,to the extent that the ruling regime may weaken support which is already deteriorating?
Something must be big enough, big enough to send the ruling regime to hell, if truth is uncovered, not because the truth of both cases, but the key in law enforcement officers that form a perpetual protection to whatever they do, even knowing they are doing wrong, i.e. taken someone else's life.
Now, what is the key? Why must ruling regime willing to forego some votes, even some seats, in exchange for truth not to be revealed.
This is clearly not ignorance, it is calculated risk to ensure truth is buried deep enough to ever see the light.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Both of them died under the care of the MACC, both of their cases were somehow twisted even to the extent of defying existing Laws, to ensure that Pandora's box is sealed tightly.
I do not think that those in power are not keen to have these cases cleared with truth revealed. this will help the ruling regime in the upcoming General Election.
Then, what is the motive of covering up the truth, protecting suspected officers ,to the extent that the ruling regime may weaken support which is already deteriorating?
Something must be big enough, big enough to send the ruling regime to hell, if truth is uncovered, not because the truth of both cases, but the key in law enforcement officers that form a perpetual protection to whatever they do, even knowing they are doing wrong, i.e. taken someone else's life.
Now, what is the key? Why must ruling regime willing to forego some votes, even some seats, in exchange for truth not to be revealed.
This is clearly not ignorance, it is calculated risk to ensure truth is buried deep enough to ever see the light.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)