I do not agree when some said it is customary for the Authority to cover up or protect the law enforcers, on cases which clearly the law enforcers are at fault, such as Teoh Beng Hock and Sabani's death.
Both of them died under the care of the MACC, both of their cases were somehow twisted even to the extent of defying existing Laws, to ensure that Pandora's box is sealed tightly.
I do not think that those in power are not keen to have these cases cleared with truth revealed. this will help the ruling regime in the upcoming General Election.
Then, what is the motive of covering up the truth, protecting suspected officers ,to the extent that the ruling regime may weaken support which is already deteriorating?
Something must be big enough, big enough to send the ruling regime to hell, if truth is uncovered, not because the truth of both cases, but the key in law enforcement officers that form a perpetual protection to whatever they do, even knowing they are doing wrong, i.e. taken someone else's life.
Now, what is the key? Why must ruling regime willing to forego some votes, even some seats, in exchange for truth not to be revealed.
This is clearly not ignorance, it is calculated risk to ensure truth is buried deep enough to ever see the light.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad