Kugan - How many round of investigation? 还需要调查多少次？

A human's life perished while in the police's custody, and there are 2 forensic reports, each described differently the cause of the death.

Say what you want, Kugan died in the Taipan Police Station.

This is a fact, the fact that no one can ever deny.

Whether Kugan died because:

1. He is drawn while he was allowed to swim the police station; or

2. Someone got him drunk until water got into his lungs; or

3. Someone forcing Kugan's head into toilet bowl, like those action movies, until he called it a day.

Is this relevant now? Is this relevant?

What difference does it make to find out how Kugan died?

He is already dead. Died in the Taipan Police Station.

So what kind of probe the Ministry of Health wanted to carry out?

1. To identify who is at fault? or

2. To drag the case further that AG cannot take action, since probes and investigations can take months if not years?

Is this relevant now? Is this relevant?

What difference does it make to find out how Kugan died?

He is already dead. Died in the Taipan Police Station.

Isn't it very clear even a dummy can point out the exact spot of where goes wrong in Kugan's forensic reports, i.e.

Why the first report claimed internal organs not damaged, while the second report stated that the first doctor did not inspect the organs, i.e. body is not cut or opened?

Isn't photographs taken by both doctors?? Just compare the two, then we already know who is lying.

So what kind of investigation do we need?

How much money do we need to spend to prove that those involved have not done wrong?

How much time do we need to waste for the Ministry when other healthcare problems are pressing and alarming?

Is this relevant now? Is this relevant?

What difference does it make to find out how Kugan died?

He is already dead. Died in the Taipan Police Station.

Where is the Health Minister by the way??

一个人死在警方扣留所，有两份结论完全不同的验尸报告。

你要说什么都行，Kugan在大班警局死去。

无从否认，这是事实。

不管Kugan是如何死去：

1. 他被允许在警局游泳而溺毙；或者

2. 某些人用水来灌他，直到他的肺入水而死；或者

3. 某些人强将他的头浸入抽水马桶，就如电影情节，直到他不行。

这一切是否有关连，是否有关连？

将Kugan的死因找出来有什么分别？

他已经死了。他死在大班警局内。

然而，卫生部要调查什么？

1. 要证实谁犯下这罪行？或者

2. 要将结案时间拖长，让检察署延後采取行动？调查工作最快也得花上几个月吧？

这一切是否有关连，是否有关连？

将Kugan的死因找出来有什么分别？

他已经死了。他死在大班警局内。

就算一个笨蛋也可以将两份验尸报告中的错误点出来，譬如

为什么第一份验尸报告写着他的内脏完好，而第二份报告却说第一次验尸没有解剖。要没解剖，如何知道内脏完好？

两名法医都应该有拍照吧？两下对照，我们就可知道谁在说谎，是不是？

那，我们需要进行怎样的调查？

我们要再花多少钱来证明牵涉者无罪？

卫生部还需要花多少时间在这起案子，当卫生部已被太多的紧急的保健问题弄得团团转？

这一切是否有关连，是否有关连？

将Kugan的死因找出来有什么分别？

他已经死了。他死在大班警局内。

请问卫生部长在那里？