Saturday, February 28, 2009
十项全能的哪急
我才知道哪急原来是法律专家。
哪急不愧是国家未来领导人,他是马来民族的英雄,87年举剑誓浴华人的血。
当了国防部长大肆添购军备如潜水艇和战斗机,极力提升马来西亚军队的战斗力,不愧是孙子之后的军事专才。
当了财政部长后坚持国家经济不受全球经济风暴影响,又一面强调马来西亚是世界排名第16的贸易国,经济基础稳固,国民无需过敏。
在歌功颂德马来西亚经济稳固当儿,突然间来一个70亿元的经济配套,首要任务是稳住股市。所以50亿的公积金就交给一个没赚过钱的ValueCap来管理。
哪急不愧是管理专才,把政府工程需要招标的下限由2万提高到50万。一下就将政府的效率提高250%。
他也是社会关怀运动的先锋,对屁眼被插的塞阜关怀备至,还拨宝贵的时间替塞阜开解,提供专业咨询服务。
说哪急不是虔诚的回教徒的人应该回家吃蕉忏悔,因为哪急敢在回教堂按着可兰经发誓不认得所有蒙古族的女人。而那个口口声声说自己被陷害的安华却没胆发誓。
哪急当官前是大不列颠国的大学毕业生,爸爸是当时权顷一时的首相,请问有何许人胆敢说他比哪急更适合当国家领导?
以哪急的履历,当美国总统都绰绰有余,想想看美国现任总统当年是街头的小混混,只会高举「改变」的口号便赢得了总统大位。要是哪急不是心在马来西亚而生在美国,他一定会将obama打得落花流水,为世界第一大国的总统。
所以我一直为哪急感到不值,十项全能的他一心一意的为马来西亚,但马来西亚人却不零他的情。
Friday, February 27, 2009
绿林大盗
这个行业并没有因为时间而消逝。然而在中国几乎销声匿迹的绿林大盗后代移居到马来西亚,摇身一变,成为了"国家经济"的贡献者。
曾几何时,绿林大盗的影响遍布马来西亚,说他们是马来西亚最有影响力的一群实在不为过。
不管是晴天雨天,好景坏景,绿林大盗的生意稳赚不赔。
合约白纸黑字写着,不论如何,都会有人买单。车民过路留下买路钱,你要抗议政府就出动红头兵。
有时「爱民如子」(Kerajaan Prihatin,Caring Government)的政府良心发现,允诺不让绿林大盗起价,决定政府自己掏腰包找数,人民就会高声赞叹,庆幸有这样一个爱心政府。
党团小丑就会一个个跳出来,说是自己争取成功,居功至伟。
听正义至上报说,当年政府和绿林大盗签署大道合约时,政府为了确保绿林大盗能顺利向银号贷款,所以才会签署「不平等条约」。绿林大盗不管盈亏,政府都必须赔款。
这次的过路费涨价,由部长宣布到首相要求内阁重新考虑,到内阁决定将涨价延后到年底,许多人都说政府没协调,朝令夕改。
但是,你要将事情看远一点,就会看到很清楚,我们其实统统做了傻瓜!
[Posted from my iPhone]
Thursday, February 26, 2009
国家领导人
当年的"极端"领袖是写"马来人的困境"的马哈帝。
中学后,我的马华同学对我说:不要担心,马来领袖必须要极端才能在党内占一席位。位子到手后就会是全民领袖。
巫青团团长哪急在那年高举马来剑,誓将浴上华人的血。
打工时有幸与当年的总会长排排坐。他说我们华人一定要忍,巫统都是这样子,一定要让他们在族群面前威一下,好让马华在内阁能够替华社争取权益。
那年没有大风大浪,只是两年后南洋被收购,据说是南洋报不听话。
308前的巫统大会,某人再次举剑,而与巫统"平起平坐"的马青仔高举宪法,闹得不亦乐乎,最后接受某人的"如有得罪之处,我将道歉。"的"道歉"。过后马青仔见人就说:「某人道歉了,不要逼人太甚。」
我们反正驼鸟惯了,大家只会说来届大选会教训这些烂瘫,不过来届大选,依然会是国阵当家,马华不当权。
不信,你等着瞧!
要国阵能不顾民怨,他们还会顾忌你的选票?
人民怨气管他娘
能捞多少最重要
大道可以不起价
政府依旧可赔款
借问赔款钱那来
都是人民血汗钱
涨二减一有着数
满心欢喜暗自笑
你我才是冤大头
[Posted from my iPhone]
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
两件非常奇怪的事
民联限赞比里48小时解散州议会
魏家祥痛斥安华说谎挑战发誓
Monday, February 23, 2009
阿里爸爸的40头尊贵的牛牛
Saturday, February 21, 2009
单细胞生物
单细胞生物者,无脑之人也!
有许多的人,徒具人形,但却与单细胞生物无异。
但是,人形单细胞生物却事事要插一脚,惟恐天下人不知他阁下是单细胞。
不幸的是,这些人形单细胞生物却偏偏有许多是我们的社会精英。所谓「精英」,权高位重者也。为何权高位重者被誉为「精英」,那就要问媒体为何只是粉饰太平而不说真话。
单细胞生物的惟一功能就是生存下去,不管环境有多恶劣。
除此之外,单细胞生物的特点是不断的吞噬周围一切可吞不可吞的东西;当然单细胞生物没有记忆,它们只知道特定的动作,50年不变(邓老说的,要不服气找他理论去),不会将之发扬光大,也不会收敛。
最近发生的一连串事件,可以很清楚的看到那一些是人型单细胞生物。
但是,事先声明,本文并不针对任何事件,自己对号入座者,无法度,度不得,也无能为力,保重吧!
[Posted from my iPhone]
Friday, February 20, 2009
Virtual reunion of an old friend
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
乌托邦不是梦想
民仆关心的是自身的利益,跳槽拉倒民选政府的,暗箭伤人的,胡言乱语的,颠倒是非的,你民我主的比比皆是,如恒河沙数,
人人都说为国为民,尽心竭力,道德清高。当中却又有多少人做得到"民之所欲,常在我心"?
当今最切身的难题是经济,最难处理的也是经济。人民的生活日益艰难,可是我们供养的尊贵的人民代议士却没一个那得出真本事。
我们看到听到的都是你错我对,有我没你,务必要将对手斗倒斗臭斗垮,誓死方休的红卫兵手段。
进入了21世纪后,人民代议士的水平还停留在20世纪的文化大革命时代。究竟我们做错了什么?为什么我们允许这些拿我们薪水的尊贵的代议士如此这般?而我们却只会躲在黑暗的角落哭诉?
为什么我们不站起来,告诉我们的民仆,我们才是真正当家作主的?
站起来吧!我们不能在任由政客舞弄,我们不能再让他们为所欲为,我们不能够再让他们无止境的操弄下去。
今天开始,实现你梦想的乌托邦吧!
[Posted from my iPhone]
醒来吧!马来西亚!
Chorus:
One blue sky above us
One ocean lapping all our shore
One earth so green and round
Who could ask for more
And because I love you
I'll give it one more try
To show my rainbow race
It's too soon to die.
1. Some folks want to be like an ostrich,
Bury their heads in the sand.
Some hope that plastic dreams
Can unclench all those greedy hands.
Some hope to take the easy way:
Poisons, bombs. They think we need 'em.
Don't you know you can't kill all the unbelievers?
There's no shortcut to freedom.
(Repeat chorus)
2. Go tell, go tell all the little children.
Tell all the mothers and fathers too.
Now's our last chance to learn to share
What's been given to me and you.
(Repeat chorus one and a half times)
Words and Music by Pete Seeger (1967)
(c) 1970 by Sanga Music Inc.
Monday, February 16, 2009
向黄洁冰抛石头 - Casting stones on YB Elizabeth Wong
Saint No.1 is none other than Khir Toyo. He is probably one of the first to throw stones. He questioned YB Wong on her "ethic". What ethic does he means? Make sure you wear cloth and cover your body all the time, even when you sleep, shit, or bath?
And if someone peeping without your knowledge, is it your fault or that someone's fault?
And if someone else adding salt to the wound, like the mighty Khir,, is that someone sinner than the one who leak the photos?
What makes me wonder is why Guang Ming Daily indicate that the suspect of this incident is running away to Indonesia? Isn't Thailand a better choice? Or is it a planned smear action from someone hidden from the back whom have link to Indonesia?
Saint No 2: our infamous Botak made a statement that PR representatives are not ethical as they are suppose to.
Wah! Before the Botak's machai go investigating what actually happening, Botak play the role of God by telling everyone that PR reps are not ethical.
You can surely imagine what is the result of such "investigation".
向黄洁冰抛石头的尊贵的人民代议士,请问你们都是圣人吗?
圣人一号鸡都要公开要求黄洁冰辞职,理由是这件事有违道德。
如果根据鸡都要的说法,是不是说阁下睡觉、冲凉、大便是,都务必穿衣服,不要让自己的身子有机会露出来,这样别人就没机会偷拍你的裸体照。
我们斗升小民期盼鸡生能现场示范,让我们开开眼界,今生受用不尽。
不过光明日报今天的头条说此事件的嫌犯以落跑印尼。奇怪的是要逃走的话,泰国是最容易逃的地方,为什么会跑到印尼去呢?
是不是有幕后人? 而这幕后人跟印尼有关?
圣人二号是我们名扬四海的地中海塞虾米。在他辖下的马仔才刚刚接到受害人的投报时他已大大声的说民联议员有问题。
哗然!马仔调查还没开始老板已经定了案,调查的结果可想而知。
马华有此议员,就如“党中无大将,虾米当先锋!”
对不起,他连廖化都不如!
向冯镇安学习吧!不要老是想拍党总会长和鸡都要的屁......................股!
不长进!!
[Posted from my iPhone]
This land is your land
THIS LAND IS YOUR LAND
By Woody Guthrie
As I was walking that ribbon of highway
I saw above me that endless skyway
I saw below me that golden valley
This land was made for you and me.
I've roamed and rambled and I followed my footsteps
To the sparkling sands of her diamond deserts
And all around me a voice was sounding
This land was made for you and me.
When the sun came shining, and I was strolling
And the wheat fields waving and the dust clouds rolling
As the fog was lifting a voice was chanting
This land was made for you and me.
As I went walking I saw a sign there
And on the sign it said "No Trespassing"
But on the other side it didn't say nothing
That side was made for you and me.
In the shadow of the steeple I saw my people
By the relief office I saw my people
As they stood there hungry, I stood there asking
Is this land made for you and me?
Nobody living can ever stop me
As I go walking that freedom highway
Nobody living can ever make me turn back
This land was made for you and me.
© Copyright 1956 (renewed), 1958 (renewed), 1970 and 1972 Ludlow Music, Inc.
[Posted from my iPhone]
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Old favorite revisited - American Pie
非常细心•富有爱心•选举委员会
因为选举委员会心疼政党,担心政党因为党选而忽略补选,所以将补选日期定在巫统党选之后。
但是主席说补选日期不是为了巫统党选而定,换句话说就是:"我们喜欢什么时候补选就什么时候,论不到巫统来影响!"
果然掷地有声,一副"我是最高元首委任的主席,我任何帐都不卖,你们可别把我看扁了。"
我肃然起敬,就在吃晚饭阅读情在人间报读到此头条新闻时高声叫起来,手舞足蹈,兴高采烈,不足表达我心中对主席的敬仰!老婆大人看到我的表情,还以为我中了邪!
再往下读,哎呀!副主席说:"巫统正在党选,要让政党能舒适的应对补选。"
我不禁怒发冲冠!咬牙切齿!恨不得将副主席乱"队"一番,以示我对主席的敬仰得以发扬光大!让其他小人不得对最高元首委任的主席有丝毫的不敬,胆敢和主席唱反调。
但是,想深一层,情在人间报也实在太过份了,胆敢将两段互打嘴巴的话同时登在一起,还将它当头条新闻用,怕死读者不知,这也太草率一些了,该当何罪!
不过,查证了选举委员会的网站,发觉其实巫统并没有向选举委员会注册,巫统并不是选举委员会认可,可以参加选举的政党。
那么,主席和副主席为什么要左一句巫统如何如何,右一句巫统这般这般呢?
想到这里,又不其然心生敬佩之心,对于主席和副主席对没注册的政党爱护有加。想必他们对已注册的政党想必是更加疼爱,所谓爱之深,对已注册的政党一定有更高的要求。
所以我说,民联诸公,不要对选举委员会诸多批评,你们的主席副主席还疼爱着你们呢!
[Posted from my iPhone]
Friday, February 13, 2009
愚人内阁
不知道是那一个大整蛊,害到哪急要在愚人节接棒。
不知道在当天的内阁会议会不会有什么政策性的决策?而这些决策会不会被人民当成是玩笨的呢?
要是那天愚人内阁的愚人决策是2700亿的经济复苏配套,人人有份,永不落空,我当一马当先,登高望北三呼:
愚主万岁万万岁
愚人配套利愚民
人人有份笑哈哈
哪急果然真明主
出手大方兼大款
打倒民联靠愚策
无须到处找青蛙
但愿永世为愚民
民主怎能当饭吃
[Posted from my iPhone]
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
顾问
马来西亚近年来最热门的职业是:
顾问
先有前妇女及社会发展部长撒梨渣受委为具部长地位的同部门顾问後,霹雳州变天後国阵将此举发扬光大。
我说我的妈呀,我也是小小的一个顾问。
放眼身边的朋友,许多也是顾问:
灵异界的朋友是风水顾问;
医科毕业、主攻半人半机械的(cyberorg)现在是电脑安全顾问;
从事广告业的是市场顾问;
做翻译的是语文顾问;
做新闻的是时事顾问;
清洁业的是卫生顾问;
旅游业的是休闲顾问;
教师是教育顾问;
搞政治但无缘当官的朋友是政治顾问;
。。。。。。。
马来西亚真的很伟大,选举输了也能走后门当官,美其名为各族群代表,顾问嘛:或又顾又问,或只顾不问,或不顾不问,任选其一,当为天降大任,无愧于心。
你说,我们是不是太幸福了,满街都是顾问!
为此,特书儿歌一首,为马来西亚成为顾问国欢呼!
排排坐,吃果果,行政议会里顾问多,
顾问多,来唱歌,唱起歌来真快活。
若诸君有空可鼓歌股歌一番,看看马来西亚服务业对国家收入的贡献,就会明白顾问对国家的贡献。
[Posted from my iPhone]
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
选举劳民伤财?
一说跳槽该死,一说民联活该,一说国阵玩臭,一说苏丹英明,一说王室干政。
总之,天天新款,千变万化,眼花缭乱,不知所谓,胡言乱语(我在说我自己,别对号入座)!
但是,吸引我的是有人说「选举劳民伤财」,我欲哭无泪,无语问苍天。心里暗想:是不是说这句话的人头壳派料,还是他们本来都不投票,也没权投票,怎么胆子这么大,比宪法还大?
话说选举,乃宪法赋予人民的基本权利,喜欢不喜欢,都要定时举行选举。
就连专制国家如缅甸,军人政府不是一样要举行选举,还政于民一番,以示公正合法。
反对霹雳州重选的论调莫过于现在经济困难,选举劳民伤财,人民自顾不暇,没空投票。
但是,选举要是可以因为经济而放在一边,可以因为"劳民伤财"而押后,又或可以因为人民没兴趣而让路,那为何还要选举投票?
不如玩大小定江山,省时省力又省钱,大家还可以跟风投注,搞不好还可能发一笔赌大小之财,到时人人赌大小,选举干他娘!
[Posted from my iPhone]
Monday, February 9, 2009
中华民族的礼仪廉耻
令我感触的是阿鲁姆甘是印裔友族,而非深受五千年历史文化熏陶的中华民族。
不论阿鲁姆甘是否曾经念过中文,又或者印度文化中的礼仪廉耻要比中华民族的更好更能入脑,不能否定的是阿鲁姆甘的确比行动党的两名华裔州议员更懂得什么是礼仪廉耻。
对不起,弄错了,一位是行动党的前议员兼州议会副议长许月风,另一个是口口声声说如果州政府坚持推行"令华族不安的政策",他将会考虑跳槽到国阵的林思年。
我的妈呀!原来华裔议员已经升华到利用要挟而不是阿鲁姆甘的礼仪廉耻了。
现在我终于明白,华人不愧是做大生意的,礼仪廉耻干他娘去!
[Posted from my iPhone]
不可能的梦想
Sunday, February 8, 2009
当权者怕的是啥?
伤心以後,应该如何?
回头看一看,其实许的动作微不足道,可怕的是幕后操刀人。
想一想,让大家矛头指向许的幕后人也许在得意洋洋的偷笑:「这群傻瓜果然如此」
我们「兴高采烈」的极力配合,全民操干许,忽略了背后隐藏更大的危机。
人人都说,下届大选回给不尊重民意的夺权者好看。
但是,当权者会不会傻到等到大选来让人民还击?
我们是否天真的以为我们可以通过大选来教训?
当民意都可以强奸时,他们还会在乎你的选票?
当宗教场地都可以发射催泪弹或摧毁时,我们能期望他们会有慈悲心吗?
远的不说,就看看缅甸。
[Posted from my iPhone]
Friday, February 6, 2009
还政于民!
事情的演变,让我们清楚的看到我们的理想和意愿在当权者和所谓的人民代议士看来并不是如他们一直卦在口中的"民之所欲,常在我心"。
当事情发生後,我们看到的是活脱脱的一幕闹剧。
双方人马公开的互数对方的不是,务必要使对方斗臭斗垮,或者对跳槽者鞭挞或辩护。
胜利者一味的以合乎宪法的说词辩护,而失败者却要人民裁决谁才应该当家。
问题是:当宪法与民意相左时,何以为重?
宪法和法律的存在及功能是确保人民的权益,或者可以说是用来确保大多数人的利益。当民意要求重选时,当权者应用宪法绕过民意的做法已经违背了宪法精神。
在此看来,巧妙的利用宪法条文来达到私己的目的,都不是一直以来所提倡的宪法精神。
小至跳槽者说他的选民支持他跳槽,或跳槽後选区才能有实质的发展,都是为自己的动作自圆其说,并没有民意的支持。
大至掌权者说宪法赋予他一旦有多数的议员支持就可执政,而没有通过民意的考验,在我看来也不符合宪法精神。
要是人民被动的接受没有民意基础的作法,那就会给当权者一个"人民不再乎"的讯息。当权者是否会因此严本加疠, 认为民意不需受到尊重,以後如有机会就如法炮制。到时会不会有如台湾两蒋时代的万年国会?
当初制定宪法的先贤或许没有预见会有这麽一天,但这并不表示他们会同意当权者的做法。
最符合宪法精神的做法,就是还政于民!
[Posted from my iPhone]
九洞香炉人人可插,就是行动党插不得!
SMSs received
dissolution of the State Assembly and call for a fresh election
Http://books.dreambook.com/duli/duli.htm and click the hyperlink "sign
my Dreambook"
Send to all your friends
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Perak! Oh Perak!
For those who wanted a CHANGE, the reality is: you don't get what you wanted, you get what your employee planned and think what you deserved.
Is there a respect to the voters voting those who defected? NO! there's no respect at all!
Defectors may claim that they win they seat not because of other factor but themselves. Well, if that's the case, why not let the voters show if it is correct?
My humble experience back in 1999 was that I don't even know who is the candidate of the Opposition but I have voted for him, although he lost.
Other than personal image, isn't the political party those defectors once associated with helping them to win the seat?
Well, most may argue that opposition candidates received no aids, especially financial aids from their party, and they have to foot the bills.
But aren't those volunteers who helped to campaign days and nights with no material returns be counted for contribution from the political party?
Aren't those who donated to these defectors to help funding the election campaign donated because they know who the candidates are? My answer is quite simple: NO! Those who donated because the party organize fund raising activities, and the public responded to the call. Not because you have been in the party for 20+ years that everyone should know you and give you what you need to campaign.
What the donors, the volunteers, the voters who voted for you, and those who have openly voice their support to you, your party, wanted to see is good leadership by example, work for the people instead of your ownselves, and be brave to seek for fresh mandate should you decide on 180 degree U turn during your political journey.
Those who defected failed to recognize the fact that they are no one if voters not voted for them. They failed to remember it is their party who field them instead of others. They failed to realized that the fundemental of Democracy that the Rakyat is the BOSS and not them.
They even failed to realized that they have been keeping afloat funded by the Rakyat and not themselves.
They should be shamed for what they have done when defecting from one side to the other, that they have betryed those who trusted them.
And for BN and PR "manages", do your duty as given by the Rakyat. We are in the midst of the unprecedented worst ever economic situation and you guys instead giving us this free show that will hurt us further!
[Posted from my iPhone]
the Perak Drama - What's the point of having elections in the future?
Perak - Where are you, Rakyat?
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Protectionism vs liberalization
This is evidence in Malaysia where car industry, for example, is protected by high import duties and approved permits (AP, where only AP holders are allowed to import cars at a quota).
Since 1980s, the then Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad driving the nation to industrial age by creating the first car manufacturing industry, Proton.
Proton was given preferences and priority when the nation formulated it's economic policy.
This is a clear example of protectionism where industry are protected and hence enjoy extraordinary benefits as compare to other industries. The benefits includes low cost on raw materials, high selling prices yet lower than competitors' artificially created prices due to unfair import duties and restrictions on number of units to be imported.
The government, when defending their move on protectionism, also giving the excuse where local industries is to be cultivated and nurtured before it faces competition. Eventually the consumers are the one who stand to loose as they are forced to pay higher for often sub-quality products.
This, it is the consumers who protects the industry, not the government as claimed by many.
But is this the best way to cultivate a given industry?
Should the nation suffers for an industry or two just because they need to be protected?
Let's look back on how Spartan train their kids. Upon growing up to a certain age, the kid is thrown to a jungle and if he survive, he is declared as a grown up man, else he is not fit to live on earth.
We may not go to this extreme but we shall review whether we need protectionism to maintain our industry?
If the given industry is too costly to maintain, shall we still go on to protect them and consumers in turns paying thru their nose?
If there's no barrier for foreign products to compete with the local products, the local manufacturers will either do their best to improve the quality of their products; or they failed and be eliminated from the game. This may sound cruel but it is the game of survival that we are talking about. Instead of dragging the whole nation, like what was happened to India until the 90's where most industries are protected, at the expense of the people, we should allow our industries to face the real world instead, and it should not cost the nation generations to pay for the industries.
[Posted from my iPhone]
Monday, February 2, 2009
Who really care about economy?
Anyone????
[Posted from my iPhone]
Flip-flopping
Current political situation in Perak
Both sides seems to do their best to lure the oppisite representatives crossing over to their side, but none really care how the people feel about the whole drama.
I would suggest to dissolve the State Assembly, and have a snap election to allow people of Perak to decide on which side should be their care taker instead.
Both Pakatan Rakyat and Barisan Nasional should have the guts to face the verdict by the people they claimed representing.
Some said it may be too heavy the prize to conduct an election for Pakatan Rakyat as they are currently the ruling regime of the state. Some said it is better to solve the taggling problem once and for all and if given the 2 recent by-election results, Barisan Nasional should have no chance of winning.
My concern is more on who should decide on which party to lead the state, be it Barisan or Pakatan.
Let the people decide. Yes, the people should decide instead.
[Posted from my iPhone]